This article argues that Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, which prohibits the threat or use of force, should be interpreted to cover economic cyber-attacks, not only those causing physical or kinetic harm. The author, Ido Kilovaty, contends that the traditional distinction between kinetic and non-kinetic effects is outdated given that severe economic cyber-attacks can inflict harm comparable to physical attacks. He proposes a framework of factors for assessing when an economic cyber-attack rises to the level of a use of force, arguing that sufficiently grave economic cyber-attacks should be capable of triggering a state's right of self-defense and the UN Security Council's authority under Chapter VII. Kilovaty illustrates the stakes with the 2013 Associated Press Twitter hack, in which a false report of explosions at the White House briefly caused a sharp drop in the Dow Jones index.
How to cite
Ido Kilovaty, Rethinking the Prohibition on the Use of Force in the Light of Economic Cyber Warfare: Towards a Broader Scope of Article 2(4) of the UN Charter, 4 J.L. & Cyber Warfare, No. 3 (2015), https://www.jlcw.org/articles/rethinking-the-prohibition-on-the-use-of-force-in-the-light-of-economic-cyber-warfare-towards-a-broader-scope-of-article-2-4-of-the-un-charter.