This article by James E. McGhee examines the imprecise vocabulary used to describe cyber incidents, arguing that events are routinely labeled "hacks" or "attacks" without any consistent standard for why they qualify as such. Drawing on examples including NATO's published timeline of cyber incidents and a 2013 defacement of the Marine Corps recruiting website attributed to the Syrian Electronic Army, McGhee contends that this terminological looseness has real consequences for how cyber law and policy respond to such events. The article situates this imprecision as a central obstacle to developing a workable legal framework for classifying and responding to cyber incidents.
International Law
Hack, Attack or Whack; The Politics of Imprecision in Cyber Law
In plain terms
More in International Law
All →JLCW · 2026 · §INTL-LAW01
No State is an Island in Cyberspace
This article, by Jessica Malekos Smith, examines the challenge of applying international law to cyber espionage in light of the anonymity and attribution problems that pervade cyberspace. Smith argues that economic…
JLCW · 2026 · §INTL-LAW02
A Brave New World: Applying International Law of War to Cyber Attacks
This article by Noah Simmons addresses the unsettled legal status of cyberattacks under international law, arguing that existing "use of force" and "armed attack" analyses under the UN Charter do not adequately account…
JLCW · 2026 · §INTL-LAW03
Democrats and Republicans Seek Federal Jurisdiction Over Cybercrimes by Foreign Actors in DNC v. Russian Federation and Broidy Capital Mgmt. v. State of Qatar
This article examines whether U.S. courts have jurisdiction over foreign actors accused of cybercrimes, using two 2018 lawsuits as case studies: the Democratic National Committee's suit against the Russian Federation…