This article explores the legal framework surrounding internet communication blackouts during non-international armed conflicts, particularly in the context of the 2011 Egyptian uprising.
The author argues that while internet blackouts can have significant consequences, such actions do not constitute an “attack” under international law, specifically in non-international armed conflicts, as they do not result in the use of violence or physical damage. The article draws a clear distinction between the legal ramifications of government-imposed internet blackouts versus those enacted by non-state actors, highlighting the potential for violence and destruction in the latter scenario.
The author also examines the evolution of international law regarding armed conflicts, particularly the convergence of principles applicable to international and non-international armed conflicts, and the need for a clear framework for classifying cyberwarfare actions.
